Legal Opinion

State v. Robbins

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 6, 1983No. 60A83PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Chief Justice.

Defendant first assigns as error the trial judge’s denial of his motion to dismiss on grounds of insufficient evidence. Defendant contends that the State failed to show the existence of malice sufficient for the jury to find him guilty of second-degree murder.

The test of the sufficiency of the evidence in a criminal case is whether there is substantial evidence of each essential element of the offense charged, or of a lesser included offense of that charged. State v. Roseman, 279 N.C. 573, 184 S.E. 2d 289 (1971); State v. Mason, 279 N.C. 435, 183 S.E. 2d 661 (1971).

The…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Hankerson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. State v. HankersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. FoustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. State v. DuboiseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. RobbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. McKoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  4. State v. AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  5. State v. WeeksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API