Legal Opinion

Gambino v. Northern Insurance Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1925No. Docket No. 76PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

(after stating the fads). There are numerous assignments of error but we think but one phase of the ease need be considered. That the provisions of the Michigan standard form of policy which we have quoted are valid and enforceable is not questioned. Plaintiff, however, claims that the statement to his agent by Garessi and the statement of Fischer to his attorney amounted to a denial of liability by the company, hence a waiver of proof of loss, and the trial judge so held. But waiver, in order to bind the company, must be by the company through its officers or agents acting within the sphere…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. Ohio InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Improved-Match Co. v. Michigan Mutual Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Popa v. Northern InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Barry & Finan Lumber Co. v. Citizens' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Johnson v. Yorkshire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Westchester Fire Insurance Company, and v. William M. Hanley and Lily v. Hanley, AndCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
  2. Serbinoff v. Wolverine Mutual Motor InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Henne v. Glens Falls InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Fenton v. National Fire Insurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Gambino v. Northern Insurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API