Legal Opinion

Henne v. Glens Falls Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1929No. Docket No. 89, Calendar No. 33,806PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

The plaintiff is a common carrier of merchandise. He owns several trucks and vans which are used to transport such merchandise on the highways. He desired indemnity insurance which would reimburse him for amounts he might be required to pay shippers for losses occurring in transporting such goods. He did not seek and did not receive a fire insurance policy. He received an indemnity policy, referred to in the record as a “floater” and as “transportation and marine.” It indemnified him for losses he was required to pay on goods destroyed in transit while being carried on one of his trucks. This…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ruddock v. Detroit Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Serbinoff v. Wolverine Mutual Motor InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Barry & Finan Lumber Co. v. Citizens' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Bonewell v. North American Accident InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Fisk v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Prudential Insurance v. BrookmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  2. Lee v. Evergreen Regency CooperativeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Hunter v. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. House v. BillmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Cozzens v. Bazzani Building Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API