Legal Opinion
Felker v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 14, 1940No. 12986PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Beid, Chief Justice.
The allegation to the effect that the petitioner is not indebted to Johnson, “-having settled with him in full,” is defective, because it does not appear when the alleged settlement was made. The petitioner can not, after judgment, set up a settlement of the cause of action, made before rendition of the judgment. Code, §§ 39-1009, 110-501. Terry v. Bank of Americus, 77 Ga. 528 (2) (3 S. E. 154). See Parker v. Rosenheim, 97 Ga. 769 (25 S. E. 763). Compare Griffin v. Frick, 97 Ga. 219 (3) (23 S. E. 833); Register v. Southern States Phosphate &c. Co., 157 Ga. 561 (4) (122 S.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Conley v. RedwineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Fitzgerald Granitoid Co. v. Alpha Portland Cement Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Jeffries v. BartlettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- Marshall v. Armour Fertilizer WorksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
- Anderson v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- City of San Antonio v. Aguilar, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984
- Tingle v. Arnold, Cate & AllenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Foster v. FosterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Dobbs v. Titan Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.