Legal Opinion
City of San Antonio v. Aguilar
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
Decided April 6, 1984No. 04-83-00401-CVPublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUTTS, Justice.
Appellees, emergency medical technicians employed by the City of San Antonio, filed this motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction the appeal of the City of San Antonio. Judgment awarding the emergency medical technicians (EMTs) overtime back-pay was entered on June 15, 1983. The City of San Antonio filed its written notice of appeal on June 27, 1983. TEX.R. CIV.P. 356(c). The EMTs then filed this motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction. We deny the motion.
EMTs contend the City’s appeal is invalid because (1) the City Council did not authorize the city attorney to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- City of Trenton v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Sacramento Newspaper Guild, Local 92 v. Sacramento County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Ostrom v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1901
- Sutter Sensible Planning, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Pitman v. Lightfoot, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
- Gonzales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Toonen v. United Services Automobile Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
- Crooks v. M1 Real Estate Partners, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
- Hays County v. Hays County Water Planning Partnership, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.