Legal Opinion
New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Russell
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 11, 1960No. 38405PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Franicum, Judge.
The defendant in error has made a motion to dismiss the writ of error on the following grounds: (1) Because there has been no proper and legal service of the bill of exceptions on the defendant in error, and (2) because there has been no proper or legal entry of service of the bill of exceptions on the defendant in error. The bill of exceptions, signed by John F. Hardin, Robert E. Knox and Warren D. Evans, was presented to the trial judge on April 21, 1960, and an order was entered directing counsel for the plaintiff to show cause why the bill of exceptions should not be…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Genone v. Citizens Ins. Co. of New JerseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. BuckCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Whitten v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Wilkes CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Saint Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. C. I. T. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Laxton v. National Grange Mutual Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1966
- Jerrell Powell and Mrs. Sally Bargeron v. Lititz Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Canal Insurance Co. v. TateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Old Colony Insurance v. DresselCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Guy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.