Legal Opinion

Dorsey v. District of Columbia Department of Health

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 25, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2025-4045Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA VALERIE DORSEY, and MARIBELLE SABIO, Plaintiffs, v. No. 25-cv-4045 (TSC) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs Valerie Dorsey and Maribelle Sabio assert discrimination, retaliation, and hostile work environment claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621–634, against the District of Columbia Department of Health. See generally Am. Compl., ECF No. 14. Defendant moves to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API