Legal Opinion
Farrar v. Rourke
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 11, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2018-1585Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANDREW H. FARRAR, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 18-1585 (JEB) ROBERT L. WILKIE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Pro se Plaintiff Andrew H. Farrar believes that his former employer, the Department of Veterans Affairs, discriminated against and ultimately fired him. He has a series of grievances that he brings under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Rehabilitation Act. Defendants now move to dismiss on the ground that Farrar has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Because Plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.