Legal Opinion
Layman Ex Rel. Layman v. Alexander
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Decided November 18, 2004No. CIV.1:03 CV 6PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
THORNBURG, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendants’ motions for summary judgment and to bifurcate the trial into liability and damages phases. Responses to these motions have been filed and the matter is ripe for resolution.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
During the early morning hours of February 12, 2000, the Haywood County Sheriffs Department was called to Springhouse Saloon in Maggie Valley, North Carolina, to investigate an altercation between patrons. Plaintiffs Response to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [“Plaintiffs Response”], filed…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pettiford v. City of GreensboroDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2008
- Russ v. CauseyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2010
- White v. CochranCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Harrison v. ChalmersDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2008
- Alex Clay Jones v. Major Flint, et al.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.