Legal Opinion

John Secrist v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 3, 1936No. 18331PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of the offense of keeping and being concerned in keeping a bawdy-house, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $200.00 and confinement in the county jail for a term of twenty days.

Appellant’s first contention is that the court erred in overruling his motion for a peremptory instruction of not guilty. The testimony adduced by the State was such as to require submission of the case to the jury. Hence the court did not err in overruling the motion.

Bill of exception number two shows that appellant objected to the court’s charge because the court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Spangler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
  2. Renfro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
  3. Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. McLin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
  5. Key v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Holbert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
  2. O'Neil v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1943
  3. United States v. MardisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  4. Bates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1966
  5. Francis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API