Legal Opinion

Francis v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 13, 1937No. 18793Published

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

On July 3, 1937, which was after this court had adjourned for the term, there was lodged with the clerk the appellant’s application for leave to file a second motion for rehearing. The decisions are unanimous to the effect that second motions for rehearing filed after adjournment cannot be considered by the appellate court. See Silver v. State, 110 Tex.Cr.App. 512, 8 S.W. (2d) 144, 9 S.W. (2d) 358, 60 A.L.R. 290; *482Burleson v. State, 131 Tex.Cr.App. 76, 96 S.W.(2d) 785; Secrist v. State, 131 Tex.Cr.App. 182, 97 S.W.(2d) 196; McNeese v. State, 121 Tex.Cr.App. 421, 52…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Silver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Silver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Ortiz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Curg Burleson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. McNeese v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API