Legal Opinion

Chlorine Institute, Inc. v. Federal Railroad Administration

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 11, 2013No. 12-1298PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON.

Concurring Opinion filed by Circuit Judge KAVANAUGH.

KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge:

The Chlorine Institute, Inc. (Institute) 1 challenges the final rule promulgated by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) to implement section 104 of the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008(Act), which requires that a qualifying rail carrier submit an implementation plan to install a “positive train control” (PTC) system2 no later than December 31, 2015 on certain tracks used for passenger service or for transporting “poison- or…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Summers v. Earth Island InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Alemu v. Dep't of For-Hire VehiclesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  2. Electronic Privacy Information Center v. U.S. Department of EducationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  3. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. United States Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  4. Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law v. Presidential Advisory Commission on Election IntegrityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  5. Matthew A. Goldstein, Pllc v. United States Department of StateDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API