Legal Opinion

State v. Nesbitt

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 29, 1981No. 54210PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRWIN, Chief Justice:

Prior to the forfeiture of the appearance bond in question, Sam Nesbitt, appellant (defendant in a criminal proceeding) was free on another appearance bond. That bond was ordered forfeited on April 17, 1979. A motion to set aside that forfeiture was timely filed and on hearing (May 18, 1979) the forfeiture was set aside. 1

Nesbitt was thereafter released on the appearance bond involved here which was subsequently forfeited because of Nesbitt’s failure to appear as scheduled. A motion to set aside was timely filed and on hearing the trial court sustained State’s demurrer to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Daniel Migdol v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  2. Russell v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  3. Pirkey v. State Ex Rel. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  4. State v. YorkCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety v. 1985 GMC Pickup, Serial 1GTBS14EOF2525894, OK Tag No. ZPE852Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. State v. FishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  3. State Ex Rel. Dugger v. Twelve Thousand DollarsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007
  4. State v. EbenhackCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1985
  5. CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY v. BALKMANSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API