Software Design & Application, Ltd. v. Hoefer & Arnett, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ANDERSON, P. J.
This is an appeal from judgments of dismissal after the court sustained demurrers and appellants 1 declined to amend. Although they were strangers to, not customers of, the respondent banks and brokerage firms, 2 appellants attempted to recover from them on several theories, including negligence and conversion. The real culprit, appellants’ faithless financial consultant entrusted with a valuable portfolio, liquidated the assets with the help of his sister through an ingenious scheme involving a series of fictitious accounts. The trial court correctly concluded there was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Nally v. Grace Community ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Sun'n Sand, Inc. v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Casey v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Eric Eisenberg v. Wachovia Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- PCO, Inc. v. Christensen, Miller, Fink, Jacobs, Glaser, Weil & ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Chazen v. Centennial BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Welco Electronics, Inc. v. MoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.