Legal Opinion
Carriero v. Borough of Naugatuck
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 17, 1996No. 14862PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
The defendant borough of Nauga-tuck1 appeals from the decision by the compensation review board (board) affirming the decision of the workers’ compensation commissioner (commissioner). Naugatuck claims that the board incorrectly determined that the “cap” established by General Statutes § 7-433b (b),2 which limits the amount of heart and hypertension benefits a retired municipal police officer may receive under General Statutes § 7-433c,3 does not apply to pension benefits for years of service as provided in a union contract with the municipality.
The commissioner found the following facts. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Griffin Hospital v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Kinney v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. GantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Lawson v. Whitey's Frame ShopConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carriero v. Borough of NaugatuckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Green v. General Dynamics Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Carriero v. Borough of NaugatuckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997