Legal Opinion

Carriero v. Borough of Naugatuck

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 3, 1998No. SC 15610PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BORDEN, J.

The sole issue in this certified appeal is whether the “ceiling” imposed by General Statutes § 7-433b (b)1 upon benefits awarded under what is commonly referred to as the Heart and Hypertension Act, General Statutes (Rev. to 1995) § 7-433c,2 applies to *749cumulative payments to a retired police officer composed of permanent partial disability compensation awarded under § 7-433c and a retirement pension based solely on the number of years of service. Following our grant of certification,3 the named defendant, the borough of Naugatuck,4 appeals from the judgment of the Appellate…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In re Valerie D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Frillici v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. United Illuminating Co. v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  4. Klapproth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  5. Szudora v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Luce v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. O'CONNOR v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  3. King v. SultarSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  4. Genesky v. Town of East LymeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  5. Ciarlelli v. TOWN OF HAMDENSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API