Rubin v. Rainbo Baking Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By ROSS, J.
Appeal on questions of law from a judgment of the common pleas court of Hamilton county in fa,vor of the defendant, rendered immediately after the opening statement of counsel for plaintiff.
Both the opening statement of counsel for plaintiff and the reasons of the court for granting judgment for the defendant are incorporated in the bill of exceptions.
From such opening statement it appears that the plaintiff is the wife of the driver of an automobile hereinafter designated as the Rubin car. She was a guest rider in her husband’s car and obviously is not responsible for any…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Matz v. J. L. Curtis Cartage Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937
- Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. LungOhio Supreme Court · 1935
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rose v. Portland Traction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Cashen v. DunkelOhio Court of Appeals · 1953
- Rogers v. Allis Chalmers Mfg. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1949
- Rose v. Portland Traction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959