Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Lung
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
Evidence was adduced to show that on leaving Massillon William D. Kreiger was driving the automobile, which belonged to him, and that Arthur F. Locke was his guest. There were no witnesses as to what happened from that time until the collision with the pole. There was therefore a presumption that the situation as to who was driving continued since there was no evidence to the contrary and no different presumption arose. Industrial Commission v. Carden, ante, 344, 195 N. E., 551. The evidence adduced was sufficient to warrant the jury in finding that at the time of the collision Kreiger was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hocking Valley Ry. Co. v. WykleOhio Supreme Court · 1930
- Industrial Commission v. CardenOhio Supreme Court · 1935
- Cambridge Home Telephone Co. v. HarringtonOhio Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by18 opinions
- Nelson v. Duquesne Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Smith v. Acme Paving Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- Martin v. SloanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- State v. MirandaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Bastian v. Baltimore & O. R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.