Legal Opinion

Matter of Conservatorship of Kueteman

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 8, 1992No. 92-3PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

This is a will contest case. Karlene Kueteman initiated this action contesting the validity of the will of her aunt, Wilhelmine (Minnie) Kueteman. Minnie never married, had no children and had outlived her parents, brothers and sisters. Mavis Stipe was a friend and companion of Minnie’s for nearly forty years, and she was the primary beneficiary under the terms of Minnie’s will. Karlene claims Mavis unduly influenced Minnie when Minnie executed her will and also asserts her aunt did not have the necessary testamentary capacity at the time of the will’s execution. After the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rose v. DunnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Reddoch v. BlairSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  3. Baerlocker v. HighsmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. Gray v. FultonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  5. Baerlocker v. HighsmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Noland v. NolandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Looney v. Estate of WadeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Matter of Estate of DavidsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Noland v. NolandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API