Legal Opinion

Baerlocker v. Highsmith

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 8, 1987No. 86-298PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.

Luella Turner’s will divided her estate equally between the Arkansas Chapter of the American Cancer Society and Ouachita Baptist University. Appellants Ruth Baerlocker and Bernadine Dean, Mrs. Turner’s sisters, contested the will in probate court, alleging Mrs. Turner was incompetent to execute a will and that she was under the undue influence of persons unknown. After the appellants presented their proof, the probate judge ruled in favor of appellee Sam Highsmith, executor of Mrs. Turner’s estate. We agree that the appellants failed to meet their burden of proof…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rose v. DunnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Reddoch v. BlairSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  3. Edwards Ex Rel. Edwards v. VaughtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  4. Harwell v. GarrettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Looney v. Estate of WadeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Daley v. BoroughsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Barrera v. VanpeltSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Thomas v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
  5. Baerlocker v. HighsmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API