Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Hoechst Celanese Corp.
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided March 4, 2004No. 13-01-448-CVPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice YAÑEZ.
Appellant Doris J. Johnson challenges the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee Hoechst Cela-nese Corporation (“HCC”) on causes of action alleging disability discrimination and sex discrimination. 1 We reverse and remand.
Background
On June 26, 1978, Johnson began working with HCC as a pipefitter helper in the maintenance department. In November of 1987, she injured her shoulder at work when a three-wheeler flipped while she was riding it. In March of 1988, Dr. William Swan performed surgery on her shoulder. When she returned to work, she…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Star-Telegram, Inc. v. DoeTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- M.D. Anderson Hospital & Tumor Institute v. WillrichTexas Supreme Court · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Bartosh v. Sam Houston State University, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
- McClaren v. Morrison Management Specialists, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Mission Consolidated Independent School District v. Garcia, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010
- Williamson v. American National Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
- Amedee v. Shell Chem. LPDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2019
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.