Legal Opinion
Bartosh v. Sam Houston State University
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
Decided June 30, 2008No. 06-07-00086-CVPublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Chief Justice MORRISS.
None would argue that Ann Bartosh and Martin Amorous agreed on religion. For some years, Bartosh was employed as slide librarian for the art department at Sam Houston State University 1 under the supervision of Amorous, the department head. Bartosh claims that her February 8, 2002, termination as a University employee was both religious discrimination 2 and retaliation for her earlier report to University officials alleging a hostile work environment 3 directed at her Christian faith. Bartosh pursues those two termination claims — disparate-treatment…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Donaldson v. Texas Department of Aging & Disability ServicesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Tammy Anderson v. Houston Community College System and Johnella R. Bradford, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Lueck v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
- Nairn v. Killeen Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2012
- Santi v. University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.