Legal Opinion
Amedee v. Shell Chem. LP
District Court, M.D. Louisiana
Decided May 31, 2019No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-00487-SDD-RLBPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
None of the documents, forms, or medical documents are authenticated and are, therefore, unreliable evidence on summary judgment. For the same reasons applicable to the analysis of Paragraph 2 of Plaintiff's statement of disputed facts, the Court will not consider Paragraph 4 of Plaintiff's statement of disputed facts.
Paragraph 19 of Plaintiff's Statement of Disputed Material Facts contains three *626parts.79 The first section of Paragraph 19 relies upon "Exhibit 25, Shell 798".80 Exhibit 25 is a one-page document reflecting two email messages in an email string. Plaintiff relies upon the top…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Adams v. Lakeview Medical Center, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2022
- Collins v. Control Worx LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2022
- Dunn v. Folgers Coffee CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2022
- Jackson v. Hiller Companies, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2021
- Kittling v. Boise Cascade L L CDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.