Legal Opinion

Affolter v. Baugh Construction Oregon, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 7, 2002No. 9904-03897; A110867PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his defamation claim after the trial court granted defendant Baugh Construction Oregon, Inc.’s motion for summaryjudgment. Because we conclude that there are questions of fact with regard to one of the alleged defamatory statements, we reverse the trial court’s ruling.

In reviewing the trial court’s ruling, we determine whether the record on summary judgment, when viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff, shows that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. No genuine issue of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Slover v. Oregon State Board of Clinical Social WorkersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. Wallulis v. DymowskiOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Wattenburg v. United Medical Laboratories, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Reesman v. HighfillOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Benassi v. Georgia-PacificCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lansford v. Georgetown Manor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. Herrera v. C & M Victor Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. Sweet v. Tigard-Tualatin School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Pippert v. NieceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API