Legal Opinion

Pippert v. Niece

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided October 9, 2007No. Civil 06-6130-AAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

AIKEN, District Judge:

Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, partial summary judgment, asserting they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law on plaintiffs’ claims for violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), tortuous interference with economic relations, breach of contract, defamation, violation of Oregon’s Unlawful Debt Collection Practices Act (“UDCPA”), and intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”). Plaintiffs concede defendants’ motion for summary judgment on their IIED claim. Plaintiffs filed a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Karen Maguire, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Citicorp Retail Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  5. Taylor v. Perrin, Landry, deLaunay & DurandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API