Legal Opinion
Sasso v. Koehler
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided January 24, 1978No. Civ. Y-77-1060PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOSEPH H. YOUNG, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Leo Sasso and Daniel Jordan, are the former sole owners of Milcom Products, Inc. (hereinafter Milcom), which was sold to Transitron Electronic Corporation (hereinafter Transitron), pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated February 6, 1968. Defendant, John Koehler, is a former director of Transitron, and an attorney who represented Transitron, as a successor to Milcom, in two Renegotiation cases under the Renegotiation Act of 1951, as amended, before the Renegotiation Board and the Court of Claims from 1968 until…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Finch v. Hughes Aircraft Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Morley v. CohenDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1985
- Butcher v. Robertshaw Controls Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1981
- Richard Shofer v. Hack Company, Stuart HackCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Simmons v. OceanDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.