Richard Shofer v. Hack Company, Stuart Hack

OPINION

HERLONG, District Judge:

Richard Shofer (“Shofer”) appeals the district court’s granting summary judgment in favor of The Stuart Hack Company and Stuart Hack (collectively “Hack”). Shofer sought damages from Hack for allegedly failing to give proper advice about the tax consequences of borrowing from his pension plan. The district court held that Shofer’s claims were barred by the applicable statute of limitations. We affirm.

I

Shofer owns and operates Catalina Enterprises, Inc. which transacts business as Crown Motors, a used car dealership. Catalina Enterprises, Inc. has a pension plan…