Legal Opinion

Hyder v. Shamy

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1935No. Civil No. 3480PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

The question involved in this appeal is whether a creditor of a discharged bankrupt may maintain an action on an oral acknowledgment of the justness of a claim barred by limitation, made subsequent to tbe time it became due and subsequent to the time of his discharge in bankruptcy, and the effect of bankruptcy on limitation. The facts making it necessary to answer such question are as follows: On April 2, 1923, John Hyder gave his promissory note, payable September 2, 1923, for $1,000, bearing interest at 8 per cent, per annum, to Abdo Shamy. On June 25, 1925, he filed his petition in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cotulla v. UrbahnTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Steinfeld v. MartenyArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Wells v. MoorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dawson v. McNaneyArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Cheatham v. Sahuaro Collection Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  3. De Anza Land and Leisure Corp. v. RaineriCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  4. Turner v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  5. In re MaysDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API