Legal Opinion
Cheatham v. Sahuaro Collection Service, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 7, 1978No. 1 CA-CIV 3418PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EUBANK, Presiding Judge.
This appeal involves the attempt of Sahuaro Collection Service to recover on a promissory note executed by Cheatham. The trial court granted Sahuaro’s motion for summary judgment, and Cheatham has appealed, arguing that the obligation is barred by the statute of limitations (A.R.S. § 12-548). We agree with the appellant, and, therefore, reverse.
On April 8, 1965, Cheatham and his wife executed and delivered their promissory note to United Producers and Consumers Cooperative, plaintiffs below. This note was supported by valuable consideration and was for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Waugh v. LennardArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- Milam v. MilamArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- John W. Masury & Son v. Bisbee Lumber Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1937
- Cashmar-King Supply Co. v. Dowd & KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Steinfeld v. MartenyArizona Supreme Court · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Amfac Distribution Corp. v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Sato v. Van DenburghArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 47, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 93 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Richard A. Jackson, Wanda A. Jackson, Harry J. Cavanagh, Geri Cavanagh, Clifton B. Cox, Helen Cox, Joseph A. Dupont, Marilyn Dupont, James D. Fox, Geneva E. Fox, Louis S. Grubb, Evelyn F. Grubb, William M. Kipp, Gayle Kipp, Clyde B. Smith, Peggy J. Smith and John B. Stiteler, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Wheel Estate Corp. v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.