Legal Opinion

De Anza Land and Leisure Corp. v. Raineri

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 14, 1983No. 1 CA-CIV 5529, 1 CA-CIV 5564PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRANT, Judge.

This is an action to foreclose certain mortgages securing a promissory note executed by Ray Development Company. We hold that the suit is barred by the statute of limitations and therefore reverse the trial court.

On December 21,1961, appellant Ray Development Co., Inc. (Ray Development) executed to the original creditor herein, Capitol Coal and Coke Company, a promissory note in the amount of $450,000. This note was secured by a mortgage upon real and personal property and other collateral security. The note and security were subsequently assigned to California Growth…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. John W. Masury & Son v. Bisbee Lumber Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Best Fertilizers of Arizona, Inc. v. BurnsArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Hill v. FavourArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Cheatham v. Sahuaro Collection Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  5. Provident Mutual Building-Loan Ass'n v. SchwertnerArizona Supreme Court · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Stewart v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  2. Miller Designs v. US BankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  3. STATE EX REL. DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY v. HaydenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  4. GAEL SLADKYUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2021
  5. Gonzalez v. US Human Rights NetworkDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API