Legal Opinion
Bamgbose v. Delta-T Group, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 8, 2010No. Civil Action 09-667PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Temi Bamgbose, brought suit individually and on behalf of others similarly situated against the defendant, Delta-T Group, Inc. (“Delta-T”), 1 alleging that Delta-T maliciously misclassified him and other healthcare workers as “independent contractors” rather than “employees.” He argues that the misclassification allows Delta-T to evade overtime compensation requirements under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA” or “Act”). The plaintiff moves for conditional collective action certification under the FLSA. The Court will deny the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Rutherford Food Corp. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Brock v. Superior Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Baystate Alternative Staffing, Inc. v. HermanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Lee v. ABC Carpet & HomeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Harris v. Vector Marketing Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Adami v. Cardo Windows, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- Hose v. Henry Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2014
- Bamgbose v. Delta-T Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Scovil v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.