Guio v. Lutes
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDudine, J.
— This appeal arises out of an action brought by the appellee against appellants on a promissory note which was in words and figures as follows: “Ninety days after date I promise to pay to the order of Guio and Mumma, One Hundred Seventy-five and no/100Dollars, negotiableand payable at First National Bank, Brownstown, Indiana, with interest at the rate of 8 per cent per annum and attorneys fees. For value received without any relief from valuation and appraisement laws. The drawers and endorsers severally waive presentment for payment, protest and non-payment of this note. The express…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Holliday State Bank v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- Puget Sound State Bank v. Washington Paving Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
- Great Falls National Bank v. YoungMontana Supreme Court · 1923
- Murrell v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- The People's Bank v. PorterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sonnek v. Universal CIT Credit CorporationMontana Supreme Court · 1962
- Paxton v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1936
- National City Bank v. Erskine & Sons, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1953