Legal Opinion
The People's Bank v. Porter
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 31, 1922No. Civ. No. 2404PublishedCited by 7 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion' of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
Plaintiff brought an action on March 3, 1921, as indorsee and assignee of two certain promissory notes, dated August 21, 1920, appellant being the maker and the Eckley-Reynolds Company, a copartnership, engaged in the tractor business; the payee thereof. Each note is for the sum of $393 and is in the same form except that one is made payable six months after date and the other twelve months after date. It will be sufficient to set out the former, as follows:
“$393. Sacramento, Calif., August 21, 1920.
“Six months after date without grace I promise to pay to the order of Eckley-Reynolds Co. at…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chicago Railway Equipment Co. v. Merchants' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- National Hardware Co. v. SherwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Meyer v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Siegel, Cooper & Co. v. Chicago Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- Liver v. MillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Allan v. Moline Plow Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Williamson v. CraigSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- United Bank & Trust Co. v. McCulloughNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
- Guio v. LutesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1933
- Langley v. AlbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.