Legal Opinion · Dissent

Duffy v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1986No. 86-21Published

1DissentUrbigkit, Justice

Honest and deep-seated philosophic conflict with the conclusions of my brethren involving the intrinsic status of democratic government and separation of powers, defined by Art. 2 of the Wyoming Constitution, causes me to dissent most forcefully.

The decision in this case is constitutionally far broader than the simple fact of the long-term penitentiary confinement for Scott Duffy resulting from his telephone calls from a confinement facility in Castle Rock, Colorado.

First, this court creates determinate sentencing in direct contravention of the Wyoming indeterminate sentencing statutes,…

2Cases cited93 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Helvering v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. In Re LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Cleveland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API