Legal Opinion

Roush v. Town of Esmond

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1950No. File 9096PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Whether the proof established the relation of employer and employee between the town of Esmond, a municipal corporation of the third class, SDC 45.0102, and the claimant, Cecil Roush, is the principal question presented by this appeal from an award of workmen’s compensation under the provisions of SDC 64.

The town of Esmond had formerly operated an electric utility. The system had been abandoned in anticipation of service to the community by an REA project. Prom con-*408Aiding testimony the Industrial Commissioner was justified in believing the following facts. While all of the members of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miller v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. State ex rel. Wagner v. SummersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Murphy v. GilmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  4. Schumacher v. SchumacherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
  5. State ex rel. Martin v. EastcottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Baker v. JacksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State Ex Rel. Workmen's Compensation Fund v. E.W. Wylie Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Fonder v. City of South Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Custer City v. RobinsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Great West Casualty Co. v. BergesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API