Legal Opinion
Fonder v. City of South Sioux Falls
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 10, 1955No. File 9494PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The city of South Sioux Falls has appealed from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff taxpayers which prevents the city from paying one Earl H. Fodness for gravel placed on its streets.
In March 1952 Mr. Fodness agreed with the street commissioner of the city to deliver gravel to any part of South Sioux Falls for $1.10 per yard. Thereafter as an immediate need for gravel at some particular location arose, its purchase was authorized by the city commission at a regular meeting, but no record of such action was made in the minutes of the meeting. Thereupon the street commissioner would place an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Los Angeles Dredging Co. v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Tobin v. Town CouncilWyoming Supreme Court · 1933
- Anderson v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Roush v. Town of EsmondSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
- Seim v. Independent District of MonroeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Nello L. Teer Co. v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Bozied v. City of BrookingsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Bak v. Jones CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
- H & W Contracting, LLC v. City of WatertownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Central Tow Co. v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.