Legal Opinion

Schumacher v. Schumacher

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1939No. File No. 8286PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

This, is an appeal from a judgment of the circuit court of Hutchinson County affirming a decision of the industrial commissioner awarding compensation to the plaintiff for injuries sustained while operating a -tractor on his father’s farm. The award was resisted on three grounds: First, that the plaintiff had no contract of employment with his father, George M. Schumacher, and that the relation of employer and employee did not exist between them because they were engaged in a joint enterprise; second, that respondent as a farm laborer was excluded from the operation of the workmen’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Roush v. HeffelbowerMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Bergstresser v. City of Willow LakeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Smith v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Schmeling v. JorgensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Alexander v. JE Hixson & Sons Funeral HomeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. State Ex Rel. Workmen's Compensation Fund v. E.W. Wylie Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Goodman v. Sioux Steel Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Roush v. Town of EsmondSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API