Lechelt v. City of Seattle
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtCallow, J.
King County appeals from an order of summary judgment precluding it from requiring that adequate access be furnished prior to the subdivision of property situated in southeast King County. The property in question comprises 200 acres of land acquired by the respondents Lechelt between 1966 and 1967. Access to the property is furnished by a county road which runs in part through the city of Seattle's Cedar River Watershed. The City generally prohibits public use of watershed property and excludes access to that property, although it has not acted to close the county road at issue in this case.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- King v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Duckworth v. City of Bonney LakeWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Deschenes v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Ackerley Communications, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- Ronken v. Board of County CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Isla Verde International Holdings, Inc. v. City of CamasWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Orion Corporation v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Lejeune v. Clallam CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- Phillips v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Sparks v. Douglas CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.