Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1936No. Docket No. 128, Calendar No. 38,048PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtToy, J.

This action was brought to recover the amount of two judgments previously rendered against Mary Wysocki, plaintiff’s decedent, arising out of an automobile accident, and is based upon an automobile public liability and property damage insurance policy issued by defendant to Alex Wysocki, the husband of plaintiff’s decedent. Trial was had in the circuit court without a jury, and at its conclusion the court found for defendant and entered a judgment of no cause of action. Motion for new trial was made and denied. Plaintiff appeals.

Upon the trial of this cause in the circuit, plaintiff…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tucker v. RohrbackMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Creek v. LaskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. McDannel v. BlackMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Le Roy v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Leib v. BostwickMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Griggs v. GriggsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  2. Wolverine Mutual Motor Ins. v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Chronister Ex Rel. Chronister v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Cross v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Detwiler v. GlavinMichigan Supreme Court · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API