Legal Opinion

Chronister Ex Rel. Chronister v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1963No. 7191PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHAVEZ, Justice.

This is the second time that this case comes before us. In our prior opinion found in 67 N.M. 170, 353 P.2d 1059, wherein the facts are stated, we held that triable issues of fact were presented and we remanded the case with direction to set aside the summary judgment and proceed with trial of all triable issues raised by garnishee’s answer.

Upon remand, appellants filed a traverse to garnishee’s answers of January 14, 1958, and February 20, 1959, in which appellants alleged that the garnishee was indebted to defendant Sparkman under the terms of an automobile insurance policy.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. ElbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Hollingsworth v. HicksNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  3. State Ex Rel. Del Curto v. District Court of Fourth Judicial Dist.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
  4. East v. FieldsWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Ealy v. McGahenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Boedigheimer v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  2. Varney v. TaylorNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Chavez v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Bank of New Mexico v. Earl Rice Construction Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Kunze v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API