Creek v. Laski
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.
This is an action in tort to recover damages for malicious destruction of a will. Plaintiff had verdict and judgment.
The will, in which defendant was named executrix, admittedly was destroyed by her after the death of her husband, the testator, because of dissatisfaction with its terms. Some four years later she filed a petition in probate court to have the destroyed will allowed. In that proceeding the attorney who drafted the will testified that it contained a bequest of $2,000 to plaintiff. Plaintiff, upon learning of the bequest to her, became a party to the proceeding and was represented…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Estate of PattersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Heirs of Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1849
- Murphy Chair Co. v. American Radiator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Mitchell v. LangleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
- Bond v. MarkstrumMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Abendschein v. FarrellMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
- MacKenzie v. Union Guardian Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
- DeWitt v. DuceSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- Curry v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- BF Farnell Company v. MonahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.