State v. Harris
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Justice.
Defendant, in lieu of assignment of error in regular form, states that he “is unable to find reversible error in the trial proceedings” and requests this Court, in the exercise of its supervisory power, to examine the record and determine if error does exist.
Ordinarily, when there is no assignment of error, the judgment of the trial court must be sustained unless error appears upon the face of the record. State v. Higgs, 270 N.C. 111, 153 S.E. 2d 781; State v. Williams, 268 N.C. 295, 150 S.E. 2d 447.
Defendant excepted to the trial judge’s findings of fact and conclusions of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.