Legal Opinion

State v. Jackson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 12, 1973No. 47PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEANCH, Justice.

During selection of the jury, defendant’s counsel posed to the prospective jurors the following question:

“Mr. Goldberg : I ask you now collectively if you find from the evidence relating to any or all the facts in this case, in view of all the evidence, that it is susceptible of two reasonable interpretations; that is, one leading to his innocence and one leading to his guilt, I will ask you now if you will adopt that interpretation which points to innocence and reject that of guilt?”

The court sustained the State’s objection to this question, and defendant contends that this…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Blackburn v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State v. IrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State v. TorainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. VinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. ConnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  5. State v. BraceySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API