Legal Opinion

Adams v. Construction Aggregates Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 3, 1956No. 307, Docket 24006Published

1Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing

2Per curiam

This petition, brought by the appellants Charles Francis Adams et al., trustees, as Owners of the S.S. Melrose, fails to persuade us to change our decision or modify our opinion.

The contention now made that the damages should be proportioned in accordance with the comparative faults of the colliding vessels, is overruled. In so ruling we do not disagree with the finding below that a division of the damages, 80% against Sandcraft and 20% against Melrose, would accord with the facts and the equities. However, the trial judge was plainly right in holding that prior…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ulster Oil Transport Corp. v. the Matton No. 20. the Petroleum No. 7. the CaruticaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  2. Ahlgren v. Red Star Towing & Transp. Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  3. City of ChattanoogaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API