Legal Opinion

City of Chattanooga

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 1, 1935No. 459PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This case raises the single question of whether it was a fault for the respondent’s tug, Tamaqua, with two barges in tow, to anchor in a fog in the fairway between Nobska Point and the High Fence Lightship in Vineyard Sound. Section 471 of title 33 of the United States Code (33 US CA § 471) gives the Secretary of War power to define and mark anchorages and to provide regulations for their use. On April 16, 1923, the Secretary promulgated regulations for “New Bedford, Outer Harbor, Buzzard’s Bay, Vineyard and Nantucket Sounds.” The limit for “Anchorage I, Nantucket Sound North Shore,” was as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Strathleven Steamship Co. v. BaulchCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1917
  2. The Willard SaulsburyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1868

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. The Southern CrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  2. United States v. HollandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1957
  3. Matter Of Charles Francis AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  4. Adams v. Construction Aggregates Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  5. United States v. HortonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API