Legal Opinion

Ahlgren v. Red Star Towing & Transp. Co., Inc

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 14, 1954No. 281, Docket 23115PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

1. Defendant’s negligence

Defendant asserts the absence of proof o'f its negligence, and argues that the sole legal cause of plaintiff’3 injury consisted of his own action in putting his foot on or outside the bow rail. 1 But there was evidence from which the jury could reasonably find the following: Plaintiff, acting under the order's of the Ocean King, was attempting to complete the tying up of the Kohl and the No. 55, when the accident occurred; in throwing the line to the No. 55, plaintiff braced his left foot on or against the inside of the bow rail; all the vessels…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Terminiello v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. The Max MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. Reliable Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Nevelin W. Wilson, Libelant-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  3. Raymond H. Manning v. M/v Sea Road, Her Engines, Tackle, Apparel, Appurtenances, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  4. Wood v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
  5. N. M. Paterson & Sons, Ltd. v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API