Ahlgren v. Red Star Towing & Transp. Co., Inc
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
1. Defendant’s negligence
Defendant asserts the absence of proof o'f its negligence, and argues that the sole legal cause of plaintiff’3 injury consisted of his own action in putting his foot on or outside the bow rail. 1 But there was evidence from which the jury could reasonably find the following: Plaintiff, acting under the order's of the Ocean King, was attempting to complete the tying up of the Kohl and the No. 55, when the accident occurred; in throwing the line to the No. 55, plaintiff braced his left foot on or against the inside of the bow rail; all the vessels…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Terminiello v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- The Max MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. Reliable Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Nevelin W. Wilson, Libelant-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Raymond H. Manning v. M/v Sea Road, Her Engines, Tackle, Apparel, Appurtenances, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Wood v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- N. M. Paterson & Sons, Ltd. v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.