Pettyjohn v. Bowler
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
Appeal from an order denying amended findings or a new trial.
Defendants entered into a contract with plaintiffs for the sale of certain real estate in Crow Wing county for a consideration of $3,000. By the terms of the agreement, $1,500 was paid in cash and “$1,500 as soon as the vendors tender a warranty deed conveying marketable title, together with an adequate abstract of title or a Torrens certificate showing good title, with interest after such tender at the rate of five percent per annum.” . At the time of the execution of the contract, defendants contemplated the preparation and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Crookston Improvement Co. v. MarshallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Vogt v. Ganlisle Holding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Ham v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Ham v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Chilstrom v. EnwallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Doyle v. WohlrabeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954