Legal Opinion
Vogt v. Ganlisle Holding Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 16, 1944No. 33,764PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Youngdahl, Justice.
Plaintiff appeals from an order granting judgment on the pleadings in favor of defendants, wherein plaintiff seeks to compel specific performance of a certain agreement involving the Piedmont Apartments, located in the city of St. Paul.
The amended complaint alleges the following facts: On December 31, 1940, the Baltimore Investment Company, in which plaintiff was an officer and director, owned the apartments subject to a mortgage in favor of one Burns, which had been foreclosed and sold at sheriff’s sale for $11,000. The period of redemption had not expired. The property…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Gile v. Yellow Cab Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Gassert v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- City of Minneapolis v. Republic Creosoting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Wiseman v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sprague v. VogtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Country Club Oil Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Minneapolis Street Railway Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Nafstad v. MerchantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- First & Lumbermen's National Bank v. BuchholzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.