Chilstrom v. Enwall
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Action by a vendee in possession to rescind his purchase of a residence property. There was a trial without a jury and a decision, on the cross-complaint of defendant vendor, for the reformation of the contract and the conveyance thereunder, and the confirmation of both as reformed. Plaintiff appeals from the order denying his motion for amended findings or a new trial. The rights of defendant Great Northern Mortgage Loan Company are not involved, the whole controversy being between plaintiff and defendant Carl Enwall.
The property involved is a residence, a transverse strip of two lots in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bush v. . HicksNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Butler v. BarnesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
- Johnson v. . TaberNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
- Crookston Improvement Co. v. MarshallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- De Riemer v. CantillonNew York Court of Chancery · 1819
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pettyjohn v. BowlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Teutsch v. HvistendahlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947