Legal Opinion

Gould v. City of Aliquippa

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 26, 2000PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

The City of Aliquippa (Aliquippa) appeals from two orders of the Court of Common Pleas of Beaver County that compel Aliquippa to produce written summaries of interviews between Aliquippa’s attorney and several witnesses to the motor vehicle accident giving rise to this litigation. In this interlocutory appeal, Ali-quippa contends that the communications in question are protected by the attorney-client privilege, that the communications are protected by the work product doctrine and that requiring an attorney to write a summary of witness interviews and create work product in a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. In Re Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  3. Ben v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Estate of KofskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. In Re Investigating Grand JurySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Custom Designs & Manufacturing Co. v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. In re Estate of WoodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Twp. of Neshannock v. Kirila Contractors, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Commonwealth, Department of General Services v. United States Mineral Products Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Ario v. Deloitte & Touche LLPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API